On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 19:31 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > While this may be the case with the current rate control > > implementations, this is not a good assumption to make. > > Multicast/broadcast frames could (and often really should) be > > transmitted at higher rate, i.e., the rate control algorithm could > > figure out that all associated STAs should be able to receive frames at > > a higher basic rate. > Good idea. I should implement this in minstrel and use the minimum value > of max_prob_rate for all stations as multicast rate ;) > > Johannes: Can you think of a good way to fit this into the API? Not really... We haven't exported station iterators (for a vif) yet, which you would need (though I would recalculate only when a station is removed, when adding you can use min(current,new)) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
