On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:35:55PM +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > Handling of multicast/NO_ACK packets by mac80211 rate scaling is a > mess. Basically, the rule of thumb is that any packet with > IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK (including multicasts and broadcasts, which > always have this flag set) should be sent at lowest rate (unless > overridden by radiotap - this is not covered in this patchset), with > no retries. While this may be the case with the current rate control implementations, this is not a good assumption to make. Multicast/broadcast frames could (and often really should) be transmitted at higher rate, i.e., the rate control algorithm could figure out that all associated STAs should be able to receive frames at a higher basic rate. As far as unicast no-ACK frames are concerned, those could (and again, should) be sent at higher rate, too, if the receiving STA can be assumed to be able to receive the frame with "large enough" probability. > So, the right thing to do in any rate scaling algorithm: > * Check for IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK. No need to check > is_multicast_ether_addr, as multicasts always have NO_ACK set. > * If it is set, select the lowest available rate (unless overridden > by radiotap), with a retry count of 0 (total try count of 1). I would not agree with these as general rules for all rate control algorithms. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
