On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:20 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > Ok, thanks for the heads up. Do you think this will generate significant > > conflicts? > > > > I'm not quite sure what would be considered significant, but it's not > trivial. At a high level, I don't think the new behaviours conflict > with the new rfkill semantics :-). But the firmware bug workaround > can't be resolved completely mechanically. And the pci-hotplug patch > touches the rfkill error path. Ok, that helps, I think I'll just resolve the conflict when it hits linux-next. Might need to ask for your help then :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
