Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 11:11 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > >> Thanks pavel, please try this patch: >> > > I checked ath5k, ath9k and b43, and in all cases last_request is > initialized before it's used by the code changed in your patch. In > fact, last_request is initialized before there is any message from ath5k > or another driver. > > I wonder if "module: create a request_module_nowait()" reverted in > wireless-testing was causing the initialization to go in a different > order. I tried reapplying it and still could not reproduce the problem > (that is, last_request is not NULL in wiphy_update_regulatory). But > maybe I'm just lucky. > > Anyway, your patch makes the code safer and doesn't break anything for > me. > I see. That would explain why it's not deterministic. I've done 5 or so test runs with the patch applied, and I haven't had any more BUGs. Thanks for the quick response! Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
