On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:15 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> +static bool is_ht40_not_allowed(struct ieee80211_channel *chan)
I think it would be nicer on the reader to remove the not?
> +{
> + if (!chan)
> + return true;
> + if (chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
> + return true;
> + /* This would happen when regulatory rules disallow HT40 completely */
> + if (IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40 == (chan->flags & (IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40)))
> + return true;
How would that happen at this point?
/me stops reading.
Ok, whatever, I know I want to rewrite most of this anyway.
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
