On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > * tosa - done now in new patch, but not even compile-tested > (http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/NNN-rfkill-rewrite.patch) One problem here remains -- the LED trigger name was forced to be "tosa-bt" in that code -- that is no longer possible now that struct rfkill is opaque. I think we should simply standardise the name to something like "<rfkill-name>-radio" Thoughts? I don't want to call it <..>-rfkill or rfkill-<..> because that would seem to imply inverted polarity. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
