Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 19:14 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:+void ieee80211_beacon_loss(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) +{ + struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw); + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata; + + rcu_read_lock(); + list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) { + if (sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) + continue; + + queue_work(local->hw.workqueue, + &sdata->u.mgd.beacon_loss_work); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_beacon_loss);Shouldn't the driver just pass the relevant vif pointer?
Nice, that way the implementation would be a lot simpler and consistent with the rest of the driver interface. Yes, I'll change it to use vif pointer.
Kalle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
