On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 19:14 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> +/**
> + * ieee80211_beacon_loss - inform that hardware does not receive beacons
> + *
> + * @hw: pointer as obtained from ieee80211_alloc_hw()
> + *
> + * When beacon filtering is enabled with IEEE80211_HW_BEACON_FILTERING and
> + * IEEE80211_CONF_PS is set, the driver needs to inform whenever the
> + * hardware is not receiving beacons with this function.
> + */
> +void ieee80211_beacon_loss(struct ieee80211_hw *hw);
> +void ieee80211_beacon_loss(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
> + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
> + if (sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)
> + continue;
> +
> + queue_work(local->hw.workqueue,
> + &sdata->u.mgd.beacon_loss_work);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_beacon_loss);
Shouldn't the driver just pass the relevant vif pointer?
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
