On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 07:34 +0530, Sujith wrote: > Sequence number handling is pretty much borked in ath9k. > There is a comment in assign_aggr_tid_seqno@xxxxxx - and it doesn't make much sense. Indeed, that doesn't seem to reflect the code at all. > Removing all crappy code in ath9k dealing with this and leaving everything > to mac80211 would certainly be the better option, but we still have to figure > out how to manage BA windows. Can you explain a little what is required? For ampdu_action(), I recently saw something, somewhere, saying "mac80211 expects us to fill in the seqno variable" or so, but this is only true if you don't use mac80211's sequence numbers, otherwise it is fine to leave it at the pre-assigned value. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
