Sujith wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > Just a quick note -- was testing fragmentation and happened to use ath9k > > as the test station, this failed utterly, it sent increasing sequence > > numbers and no fragment number. > > Sequence number handling is pretty much borked in ath9k. > There is a comment in assign_aggr_tid_seqno@xxxxxx - and it doesn't make much sense. > Removing all crappy code in ath9k dealing with this and leaving everything > to mac80211 would certainly be the better option, but we still have to figure > out how to manage BA windows. > And a quick hack to fix this would be to not increment the internal sequence number when the frame is fragmented. But that is what it would be, a hack. :) Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
