Search Linux Wireless

Which APs to disregards from in inputting into the bss list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Do we want to ignore certain APs if we determine they are bogus? An
example is 11n APs with WEP/TKIP. Would we rather not even store then
in our bss list so that way we wont' get reports from users not being
able to connect to such APs. Other examples might be if 11n APs have
HT IEs but their lengths are not right, or if the AP is HT40 and our
regulatory domain does now allow HT40.

The benefit I see with these early checks we won't get complaints
about not being able to connect to bogus APs or APs you shouldn't be
connected to anyway.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux