On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:58 +0100, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: > Hello Johannes! > > > which is what we'll continue doing in cfg80211, but I think we shouldn't > > bother the driver/mac80211 with it until the netdev is up, and thus > > reject things from nl80211. > > Do you think WEXT should only be a wrapper around cfg80211? If yes, I would agree. Yes, of course. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
