On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 14:43 +0100, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: > Hello! > > > For cfg80211's assoc/ibss calls, I think we should reject them outright > > when the interface is down, any objections? > > How should assoc in cfg80211 work? see Jouni's patches. > For WEXT I like collecting all changes while the interface is down and > the if it's up again apply them in one step. That is the reason why I > want call "*_commit()" on interface up. which is what we'll continue doing in cfg80211, but I think we shouldn't bother the driver/mac80211 with it until the netdev is up, and thus reject things from nl80211. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
