On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:48:34PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 14:43 +0100, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > For cfg80211's assoc/ibss calls, I think we should reject them outright > > > when the interface is down, any objections? > > > > How should assoc in cfg80211 work? > > see Jouni's patches. > > > For WEXT I like collecting all changes while the interface is down and > > the if it's up again apply them in one step. That is the reason why I > > want call "*_commit()" on interface up. > > which is what we'll continue doing in cfg80211, but I think we shouldn't > bother the driver/mac80211 with it until the netdev is up, and thus > reject things from nl80211. That is quite reasonable, please go for it. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
