On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:39 -0500, pat-lkml wrote: > Which leads back around to my question, should I continue pushing > patches like this your way (after making sure the right patch is on the > right e-mail with the right description), Heh :) Also make sure your patch isn't line-wrapped next time, please. The iw resend was line-wrapped. > or do we want to wait and I'll > just maintain the patches outside of git, and push them once libnl-2.0 > hits? On one hand, it makes testing both versions easier, on the other, > it makes a lot of little 'fix' commits like this. I have no issues > maintaining these sorts of patches, but I don't want to do it if you > don't want them. No, it's fine, I've committed this now, thanks. I had just thought it ought to work, based on testing with git snapshot a couple of weeks ago... Not that libnl-2.0 compiles cleanly on my system... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
