Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 11:31 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Ok. The problem is that stlc45xx/p54spi requires us to send a null >> frame every time we enable power save and that's causing problems, at >> least that's my current theory. So I need to solve this somehow, I >> need to think this more. > > True. > >> But can we still apply these patches? Because b43 doesn't support >> power save at all, and ath9k with dynamic power save disabled was >> already broken before my patches, I consider these patches as a step >> forward. And I would like to go forward one small step at a time, >> maintaining huge patches myself until all issues are fixed is quite >> difficult. > > Yes, agree, can you repost without RFC and the printk removed (and > possibly rebased)? Sure thing. I'm rebasing it right now. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
