On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 11:31 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ok. The problem is that stlc45xx/p54spi requires us to send a null > frame every time we enable power save and that's causing problems, at > least that's my current theory. So I need to solve this somehow, I > need to think this more. True. > But can we still apply these patches? Because b43 doesn't support > power save at all, and ath9k with dynamic power save disabled was > already broken before my patches, I consider these patches as a step > forward. And I would like to go forward one small step at a time, > maintaining huge patches myself until all issues are fixed is quite > difficult. Yes, agree, can you repost without RFC and the printk removed (and possibly rebased)? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
