On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Perhaps there is an internal latch on this pair; that may explain why >> you need to write low->high order. > > Either way, I think the changelog should back up the claim by > _something_. Even if it's just "tested on device XXX, old way doesn't > work, new way does" or "looked at legacy HAL code" or ... Agreed, "tested on..." would be good. I looked at the HAL and it doesn't have a set tsf function, only reset. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
