On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 21:37 +1300, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > if_cs_poll_while_fw_download() returned the number of iterations
> > remaining on success, which in turn got returned as the value from
> > if_cs_prog_real() and if_cs_prog_helper(). But since if_cs_probe()
> > interprets non-zero return values from firmware load functions as an
> > error, this sometimes caused spurious firmware load failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c
> > index 842a08d..8f8934a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c
> > @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int if_cs_poll_while_fw_download(struct if_cs_card *card, uint addr, u8 r
> > for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
> > u8 val = if_cs_read8(card, addr);
> > if (val == reg)
> > - return i;
> > + return 0;
> > udelay(5);
> > }
> > return -ETIME;
> >
> >
>
> Hmmm, I posted this same patch here a couple of months ago
> (http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libertas-dev/2008-October/002019.html),
> did I get something wrong in the submission process, or did it just get
> lost in the woodwork? Anyway:
Apparently I didn't read enough down that thread to find the second
patch; I only found the one that changed if_cs_prog_helper() and
if_cs_prog_real(). My mistake, this patch is yours.
John; when you apply, please credit Ryan.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
