On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> There is no need to check for last_request as the callers of
> update_all_wiphy_regulatory() ensure its present.
Are you sure? I had all this blow up all around me.
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/wireless/reg.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
> index 8bf999d..6c45832 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/reg.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
> @@ -1006,8 +1006,6 @@ static void handle_band_custom(struct wiphy *wiphy, enum ieee80211_band band,
>
> static bool ignore_reg_update(struct wiphy *wiphy, enum reg_set_by setby)
> {
> - if (!last_request)
> - return true;
> if (setby == REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE &&
> wiphy->custom_regulatory)
> return true;
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
