Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Thursday 15 January 2009 20:12:03 Artur Skawina wrote: >>>> Upgraded to current wireless-testing/pending on the problematic box >>>> and almost immediately got [1]. No slab corruption this time (at least >>>> not yet). Will switch to GFP_ATOMIC and retry w/ the new fw. >>> yes that's a bug, p54_set_tim must use GFP_ATOMIC, do you want to post the patch? >> nah, too trivial :) fwiw i used this: > well, it should be "done", right? :-) > > just add "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" to the cc, > change the subject line to "[PATCH] p54: set_tim must be atomic." > and put a Signed-off-by: your name <your@mail> in the mail body and a "---" to seperate the commit message > and then the patch. And it will be in the next round of -rcX fixes. well, i really meant the 'too trivial' part and was hoping you'd do it ;) ok, will resend. Is this something that could interfere w/ testing: > mac80211-phy0: failed to remove key (0, 00:1b:fb:12:34:56) from hardware (-12) ? thanks, artur -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
