On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:00 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Don't like this much, it's not really biting us (yet) to have this code > > around still. > > It means double testing, I was going to test all the work in this > series with this option but I figured it'd be better to move on. I don't think it matters much since the impact of this code is now fairly small, we simply start with a different initial setup which can always happen with crda too. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
