On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Claudio <der.claudio@xxxxxx> wrote: > Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx> wrote: >> I have to disagree here. It\'s better not to change at76_usb in staging >> to avoid any breakage. Like I said, I will submit the mac80211 port >> with a new name (most probably at76c50x-usb) as soon as I get it >> stable enough. It\'s good idea to have a working driver in staging tree >> until the mac80211 has been verified to be working. s/mac80211/mac80211 port/ Sigh, me and my infamous typos. > I think so too. > >>> Since you mentioned a) that you are working on the port again and b) >>> you are going to rename the driver for mac80211, should I just drop >>> my at76 branch of wireless testing for good? >> >> Please do, because I will submit at7650x-usb patches from scratch. But >> don\'t remove at76 branch from the legacy tree, it\'s useful for me: > > I am looking forward for testing your new mac80211 version. Please tell > me where the development happens, so that I can contribute to it. The development is slow :) I will post any patches to here as I have them. Currently I'm working on usb protocol decoder so that I can verify the differences between the original and the mac80211 port. > Regarding Ubuntu: They are still shipping an ancient version (0.14beta1!). > Sorry for considering blaming you for the problems. No problem :) > The current version of the staging-tree/directory(?) works well. I didn't find any problems, but I only briefly tested it. Kalle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
