Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:15 PM, John W. Linville > <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 03:26:55PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >>> Also I\'m going to rename the mac80211 port to something else for just >>> to avoid the confusion with the original driver. Last thing I want to >>> see is having two in-tree drivers with identical names. >> >> OK, I still have patches to recreate the original port of at76_usb >> to mac80211 and another to keep-up with a later mac80211 API change >> on the at76 branch of wireless-testing. I had intended to send them >> to Greg now that the mac80211 API change has made it upstream. > > I have to disagree here. It\'s better not to change at76_usb in staging > to avoid any breakage. Like I said, I will submit the mac80211 port > with a new name (most probably at76c50x-usb) as soon as I get it > stable enough. It\'s good idea to have a working driver in staging tree > until the mac80211 has been verified to be working. I think so too. >> Since you mentioned a) that you are working on the port again and b) >> you are going to rename the driver for mac80211, should I just drop >> my at76 branch of wireless testing for good? > > Please do, because I will submit at7650x-usb patches from scratch. But > don\'t remove at76 branch from the legacy tree, it\'s useful for me: I am looking forward for testing your new mac80211 version. Please tell me where the development happens, so that I can contribute to it. Regarding Ubuntu: They are still shipping an ancient version (0.14beta1!). Sorry for considering blaming you for the problems. The current version of the staging-tree/directory(?) works well. Claudio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
