On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 14:51 +0100, Alexander Wetzel wrote: > > Started wondering, maybe it should just not have debugfs at all? That'd > > also avoid the potential name clash, and there isn't really anything of > > value there in the first place? > > Knowing that we do have an internal virtual monitor interface may be > interesting in itself. But that's hardly something we can call "real > value":-) And that way we would solve any name conflict... :) > Not creating it would just require us to skip > ieee80211_debugfs_recreate_netdev() in drv_remove_interface() for > virtual monitor. Right, should be simple. > When you prefer that, I can send an alternate patch doing that. > Do you want that as standalone patch or as a v2 of with a new name? I don't really care, let's do whatever makes more sense? In this case I'd argue it probably makes more sense as "remove debugfs dir for virtual monitor" or something like that? johannes
