On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 13:26 +0100, Alexander Wetzel wrote: > Create/delete debugfs entry for the virtual monitor interface according > to the state of the virtual monitor interface. > > This fixes the following issues: > 1) Debugfs is not getting an entry when the virtual monitor interface > is created. > 2) Instead debugfs gets an entry when it's deleted. > 3) And debugfs warns, that it already has directory for the virtual > monitor interface every time the virtual monitor interface is > removed again after the first time. > Started wondering, maybe it should just not have debugfs at all? That'd also avoid the potential name clash, and there isn't really anything of value there in the first place? johannes
