Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To ensure where are protected by driver mutex can also be protected by
> wiphy_lock(), so afterward we can remove driver mutex safely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
10 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks.
ebfc9199df05 wifi: rtw89: add wiphy_lock() to work that isn't held wiphy_lock() yet
4afde17d2667 wifi: rtw89: use wiphy_work() to replace ieee802111_work()
831cceed3baf wifi: rtw89: debugfs: implement file_ops::read/write to replace seq_file
01fd45d9e102 wifi: rtw89: debugfs: specify buffer size allocated by devm_kazlloc() for reading
8fdf78f3cd5f wifi: rtw89: debugfs: use wiphy_locked_debugfs_{read,write}() if needed
bdf874dc3c76 wifi: rtw89: debugfs: use debugfs_short_fops
6ee1937d8bc9 wifi: rtw89: remove consumers of driver mutex
ed114a7ac636 wifi: rtw89: manual cosmetic along lockdep_assert_wiphy()
2345f351c7f5 wifi: rtw89: remove definition of driver mutex
8afa4ff99a00 wifi: rtw89: pci: not assert wiphy_lock to free early_h2c for PCI probe/remove
---
https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git
