Assuming my understanding is correct, should you not adapt
ath12k_peer_assoc_h_ht() to match this semantic ?
Hi Maxime,
Thanks for your comments..Looks like the definitions were added mainly
for test purposes to force SGI/LGI:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/1389167162-3681-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx/
While following the semantic might improve code readability, based on
current firmware capabilities, we can force LGI when user sets
set_bitratemask but cannot force SGI always as firmware might endup
choosing LGI when PER is high.
let me make changes in next revision accordingly.
Thanks
Pradeep
