Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 5/7] wifi: rtw88: Extend rtw_fw_send_ra_info() for RTL8814AU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/01/2025 08:36, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The existing code is suitable for chips with up to 2 spatial streams.
>> Inform the firmware about the rates it's allowed to use when
>> transmitting 3 spatial streams.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.h |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
>> index 02389b7c6876..0ca1b139110d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
>> @@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ void rtw_fw_send_ra_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si,
>>  {
>>         u8 h2c_pkt[H2C_PKT_SIZE] = {0};
>>         bool disable_pt = true;
>> +       u32 mask_hi;
>>
>>         SET_H2C_CMD_ID_CLASS(h2c_pkt, H2C_CMD_RA_INFO);
>>
>> @@ -755,6 +756,19 @@ void rtw_fw_send_ra_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si,
>>         si->init_ra_lv = 0;
>>
>>         rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(rtwdev, h2c_pkt);
>> +
>> +       if (rtwdev->chip->rf_tbl[RF_PATH_C]) {
> 
> Using `efuse->hw_cap.nss >= 3` would be consistent with latter patch. 
> 

I would like that, but nss is 2 when RTL8814AU is in USB 2 mode.
I assume this is to keep the current draw under the 500 mA limit
of USB 2.

What about rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num >= 3 ? I don't remember why
I didn't do that.

>> +               SET_H2C_CMD_ID_CLASS(h2c_pkt, H2C_CMD_RA_INFO_HI);
>> +
>> +               mask_hi = si->ra_mask >> 32;
>> +
>> +               SET_RA_INFO_RA_MASK0(h2c_pkt, (mask_hi & 0xff));
>> +               SET_RA_INFO_RA_MASK1(h2c_pkt, (mask_hi & 0xff00) >> 8);
>> +               SET_RA_INFO_RA_MASK2(h2c_pkt, (mask_hi & 0xff0000) >> 16);
>> +               SET_RA_INFO_RA_MASK3(h2c_pkt, (mask_hi & 0xff000000) >> 24);
>> +
>> +               rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(rtwdev, h2c_pkt);
>> +       }
>>  }
> 
> Prefer calling RA_INFO LO/HI in the same level. I meant
> 
> rtw_fw_send_ra_info()
> {
>         rtw_fw_send_ra_info_lo(); // original RA info
>     
>         if (efuse->hw_cap.nss <= 2)
>                 return;
> 
>         rtw_fw_send_ra_info_hi();
> }
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux