On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 17:41 +0530, Veerendranath Jakkam wrote: > Update 6 GHz regulatory info subfield mask and Indoor AFC standard power > type definitions to align with spec changes introduced in the Draft > P802.11Revme_D4.2, Figure 9-896 and Table E-13. > Huh. That seems like a change explicitly *designed* to break backward compatibility? Should we accept the old value from older APs or so? Otherwise we can't connect in some scenarios, I think? Or at least should we say here in the commit message or so why backward compatibility was broken, and that it was for other clients that didn't behave well or something but our code was already fine? Or am I completely confused about it? johannes
