Search Linux Wireless

Re: AR6k: to rfkill or not to rfkill ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 19 December 2008 00:59:16 Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > I think you should probably implement it.
> 
> Okay, thanks for the explanation !
> 
> > Rfkill is supposed to stop TX _immediately_.
> > So no MAC cleanup, etc...
> 
> Hmm, I'll have to measure how quick this really gets. All this happens
> in the "black box" that is the firmware. A few ms for sure, already
> for SDIO communication. Hopefully faster than hundreds of milliseconds.

Yeah, it doesn't really matter, if it's within, say 100-200ms.
I just wanted to say, you should not _generate_ new traffic (disassoc, etc..)
if you get a kill signal. Instead you should immediately drop any connection
and kill the radio.

> > Note that current rfkill subsystem implementation is not that nice and you
> > might get some headache from it. ;)
> 
> Ah, that'll be the least of my worries :-)

My head is still burning for over the last couple of months. ;)

-- 
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux