Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] wireless: ath9k: eeprom: remove platform data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:56 AM Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 7:53 AM Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/4/2024 1:05 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > >> There are no more board files defining platform data for this driver and
> > >> eeprom support through NVMEM has already been implemented. No need to
> > >> keep this old functionality around.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >>  As an aside, the last user of this functionality downstream in OpenWrt
> > >>  has been removed: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/7ac8279bd
> > >>
> > >>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 12 ------------
> > >>  1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
> > >> index efb7889142d4..df58dc02e104 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
> > >> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> > >>   */
> > >>
> > >>  #include "hw.h"
> > >> -#include <linux/ath9k_platform.h>
> > >
> > > What about the file include/linux/ath9k_platform.h? That should be also
> > > removed, right?
> >
> > That file is still used by other functionality (see init.c, btcoex.c)
> > But seems that at a minimum unused eeprom-related stuff should be removed from
> > struct ath9k_platform_data.
> That's why I kept my changes to a minimum. I don't yet want to axe the
> other stuff. OpenWrt has a ton of non upstreamed patches for ath9k,
> some probably relying on ath9k_platform_data. I need to do real
> careful analysis to remove the rest.
> >
> > Please review that all of the platform-related code in init.c is still needed,
> > especially code related to eeprom support.
That's handled with nvmem and OF (if applicable).

Anyway, I split up the removal in 4 patches. of_init needs some extra
functionality to match platform_device.

Does Documentation need to go in its own commit?
> >
> > /jeff
> >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux