On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 00:00 +0100, Stefanik Gábor wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 23:51 +0100, Stefanik Gábor wrote: > > > >> But if we redefine !ASSIGN_SEQ to mean "use the sequence number > >> supplied by userspace", we will need a new flag to distinguish between > >> driver-level vs. stack-level sequence number assignments, which is > >> essentially the same as this patch. There is no way to switch between > >> 3 states (control in driver, stack or userspace) using only one bit. > > > > Good point, I forgot about that. But that isn't true for no-ack :) > > > > johannes > > > > By the way, here is a bit more about the oops: For that to make any sense, you'd have to show me the code too :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
