On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- On Thu, 11/12/08, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> > >> > I don't know the verdict yet - but I think we need >> to either revert Johannes's earlier patch, or have this >> change from Larry incoporated, ASAP. >> > >> > Hin-Tak >> >> No, the best solution is to incorporate Johannes patch of >> today. Now that I >> understand what happened, my patch just wallpapers over his >> mistake. >> >> To explain how that happened, he used >> NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION (2) when he meant >> BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)(4). My "fix" works >> because BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) >> == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION. > > okay, I like my wlan* device not to disappear. One way or the other, this needs fixing ASAP. It was very weird to put the latest wireless-testing on and wlanX is nowhere to be found :-). I'll dig through the archive for the patch. (still not subscribe to linux-wireless - maybe I should when I figure out gmail's filtering system). > > Hin-Tak A little help: Subscribe, and when you get the first message from the list, click "Show details", then click "Filter messages from this mailing list". Gmail will configure the filter criteria for you. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
