--- On Thu, 11/12/08, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> >
> > I don't know the verdict yet - but I think we need
> to either revert Johannes's earlier patch, or have this
> change from Larry incoporated, ASAP.
> >
> > Hin-Tak
>
> No, the best solution is to incorporate Johannes patch of
> today. Now that I
> understand what happened, my patch just wallpapers over his
> mistake.
>
> To explain how that happened, he used
> NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION (2) when he meant
> BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)(4). My "fix" works
> because BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
> == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION.
okay, I like my wlan* device not to disappear. One way or the other, this needs fixing ASAP. It was very weird to put the latest wireless-testing on and wlanX is nowhere to be found :-). I'll dig through the archive for the patch. (still not subscribe to linux-wireless - maybe I should when I figure out gmail's filtering system).
Hin-Tak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
