Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:23 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Then there's user_claim_unsupported which is set by all drivers but
> > rt2x00, probably because they have hardware kill switches and thus they
> > have to set it even if it's not strictly true, because of the lacking
> > separation between these things (that I pointed out)
> 
> IOW, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to me that user_claim_unsupported
> really is a wrong name for "has hw kill", which could be avoided if sw

I never understood what user_claim_unsupported is for.  I left it alone
because of that, but it looks like some artifact of the old rfkill that did
horrible things to the input layer.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux