On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:23 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > Then there's user_claim_unsupported which is set by all drivers but > rt2x00, probably because they have hardware kill switches and thus they > have to set it even if it's not strictly true, because of the lacking > separation between these things (that I pointed out) IOW, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems to me that user_claim_unsupported really is a wrong name for "has hw kill", which could be avoided if sw and hw kill were a different thing and the rfkill structure was only used, as I'm proposing, for hw kill and sw kill _notifications_, but not the sw kill operation itself. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
