On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:40 +0100, Henning Rogge wrote: > On Wednesday 10 December 2008 10:05:50 Johannes Berg wrote: > > Uh huh, it's a huge table, and very irregular. Not very inclined to copy > > that right now. What's wrong with deferring it until somebody actually > > implements these rates? > > Okay... I will try to implement a complete version of the function when I get > access to the table... here is a modified patch with two warnings about the > missing datarates. It will return 0 for mcs >= 32. Can you do what I asked for instead and not include the attribute when it has a bogus value? Thanks, Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
