On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 07:53 +0100, Henning Rogge wrote: > Am Tuesday 09 December 2008 22:16:12 schrieb Johannes Berg: > > No, that's the thing, for 32 through 76 the calculated values are > > totally wrong, that isn't a logical extension of the scheme, MCS 73 for > > 20 MHz for example is: > > > > four streams, using 64-qam, 64-qam, 16-qam, qpsk with a coding rate of > > 3/4 for a net bitrate of 195.0 MBits > > Maybe you can just post the whole mcs 32-76 table, so I can look at it. I can > only work with the values in the wiki, and at the moment the calculation > matchs them very well. Uh huh, it's a huge table, and very irregular. Not very inclined to copy that right now. What's wrong with deferring it until somebody actually implements these rates? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
