On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 18:52 -0500, pat-lkml wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 18:18 -0500, Dan E wrote: > > There's libnl 1.2 and 2.0? That's news to me! Patches welcome. Sorry, I > > guess it needs 1.0 or 1.1, will fix the page. > > > following is a patch that gets iw working with the development versions > of libnl. I keep it uptodate at: http://wireless.erley.org/ > > The Makefile changes may not be the 'best' way to do it, but it works > for me. Thanks, I think you even sent me that once before already, but that breaks with distro versions of libnl. I guess distros will end up shipping 1.1 as libnl1 like debian does for a while? Is there any particular reason you need libnl from git? You could just check out 1.1, no? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
