Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 3/18/2024 10:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
>>>> peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
>>> chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
>>> commit message.
>> And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same?
>
> 320 MHz association was broken. It was a re-basing error while sending
> the original patch because the correct field was added during testing,
> still used that way internally too. I have not tested WCN7850 on this
> patch but yes will require the same field. Current code was setting
> QOS bit instead of 320MHz.
Thanks, does this look ok:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=c4ade6bdf3d1a2d9d05606a85431f154559d5a80
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
