On 3/18/2024 10:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
WMI_PEER_EXT_320MHZ (0x2) is defined as an extended flag, replace
peer_flags by peer_flags_ext while sending peer data.
Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.0.1-00029-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Fixes: 6734cf9b4cc7 ("wifi: ath12k: peer assoc for 320 MHz")
Signed-off-by: Aloka Dixit <quic_alokad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
What does this fix from user's point of view? Does it mean that 320 MHz
chanels were broken before and this commit fixes that? I can ammend the
commit message.
And what about WCN7850? Does it work the same?
Hi Kalle,
320 MHz association was broken. It was a re-basing error while sending
the original patch because the correct field was added during testing,
still used that way internally too. I have not tested WCN7850 on this
patch but yes will require the same field. Current code was setting QOS
bit instead of 320MHz.
