Search Linux Wireless

Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luis.

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> Side note: this behaviour is not required in all jurisdictions. German
>> regulatory body for example allows use of non-DFS-compliant gear even on
>> (at least some) DFS channels, but only with low TX power. Is that
>> supported already?
> I reviewed this internally and there is disagreement on your statement
> about German rules.

Indeed, and that is for a good reason. I have rechecked, and I found that
I have confused TPC and DFS (doh!).

> For STA devices "DFS" is required for all Europe regdomains including
> Germany for channels 52 to 140 inclusive.

Ack.

Plus, if I understand the regulatory rules [1] correctly, channels 36 to
48 don't require DFS in Germany, but may only be used in confined spaces.
However, given that I was wrong with my understanding before, it would be
good if someone else could double-check.

Sorry for any caused confusion.

Bye, Mike

[1] http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/5009.pdf (german
language, )
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux