Search Linux Wireless

Re: wireless-regdb: flaw in general functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 15:12 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

Your point about not being able to listen is a good one, and a patch to
update the the US in consideration of part 15 rules would be
appreciated. Keep in mind we have flags for such things:

  -Passive scan
  -No-IBSS

We should probably rename no-ibss to no-beaconing though as that is the
real meaning inention behind it.
Maybe you mean no-transmit?

Yeah sure, that seems to make more sense.

I'm all for adding it to crda as no-transmit but, is that a valid flag? Also, how well does it work? From a monitor mode interface you can inject raw packets out of the interface. Would just adding "no-transmit" into the crda line work? I certainly don't see this in the crda code anywhere, nor in the definition of regdb file. I presume this has to be added?

Thanks,
Rick Farina




 Luis


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux