On 13/01/2024 14:52, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On 13/01/2024 08:35, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>>> Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> Currently it takes almost 6 seconds to upload the firmware for RTL8192CU
>>>> (and 11 seconds for RTL8192DU). That's because the firmware is uploaded
>>>> one byte at a time.
>>>>
>>>> Also, after plugging the device, the firmware gets uploaded three times
>>>> before a connection to the AP is established.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe this is fine for most users, but when testing changes to the
>>>> driver it's really annoying to wait so long.
>>>>
>>>> Speed up the firmware upload by writing chunks of 64 bytes at a time.
>>>> This way it takes about 110 ms for RTL8192CU (and about 210 ms for
>>>> RTL8192DU).
>>>>
>>>> PCI devices could upload it in chunks of 4 bytes, but I don't have any
>>>> to test and commit 89d32c9071aa ("rtlwifi: Download firmware as bytes
>>>> rather than as dwords") decided otherwise anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> There's another version so I assume I can drop this one:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/0d262acd-4f94-41c2-8d15-83486aeb976b@xxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you can drop this one. Sorry about that. I forgot to write
>> "[PATCH]" in the subject. I thought you wouldn't even notice this
>> one because of that.
>
> I think patchwork assumes that any mail with a diff is a patch, like
> this one:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/c7b331edd65b66521a6605177d654e55051568a3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> So "[PATCH]" is more like a visual clue. BTW usually it's a good idea to
> mark the next mail as v2 and explain in changelog what happened/changed,
> that way everyone are on the same page. But no big deal, just trying to
> make this smooth for everyone :)
>
Ahh, got it. I will remember to do that if something like this happens again.
