On January 8, 2024 5:48:37 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
пн, 8 січ. 2024 р. о 17:43 Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> пише:On January 4, 2024 10:08:04 AM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:ср, 3 січ. 2024 р. о 20:20 Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> пише:On January 3, 2024 6:28:33 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:3 січня 2024 р. 11:22:42 GMT+02:00, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> написав(-ла):On January 3, 2024 10:14:42 AM Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:+ linux-wireless + Hans de Goede On December 16, 2023 9:14:48 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:сб, 16 груд. 2023 р. о 21:57 Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> пише:On 12/16/2023 6:45 PM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:Greetings! I am trying to submit bluetooth firmwares (BCM4329B1.*,*.hcd and BCM4330B1.*,*.hcd) and wifi calibration files (brcmfmac4329-sdio.*,*.txt and brcmfmac4329-sdio.*,*.txt) from a few Tegra 2 and Tegra 3 based devices into linux-fimware. I have faced ambiguous license issue since those files were part of Android Images of different vendors. Those vendors did not provide a license nor for android images, not for these files.Does this mean you extracted them from the android image? That probably never get accepted without any license information.Can Broadcom re-grant license to these files? This license is for bcm4329 in crespo <https://android.googlesource.com/device/samsung/crespo/+/refs/heads/main/self-extractors/broadcom/LICENSE>Actually checked this link: https://android.googlesource.com/device/samsung/crespo/+/refs/heads/main/proprietary-blobs.txt It lists the bcm4329.hcd file as falling under Apache-2.0 license. Same for asus/grouper. Regards, ArendSo this actually resolves ambiguity. ThanksYes, but ... you should add them to linux-firmware under the same license. That means you need to mark them as such in the WHENCE file. Feel free to cc: me for the patch so I can have a look at it. Regards, ArendThank you for your assistance, it is really appreciated and valued but it was rejected https://gitlab.com/kernel-firmware/linux-firmware/-/merge_requests/114 I have referred to our conversation.
I see and it seems they were correct. My bad. Clearly should not try a career as lawyer.
I can try to publish them to linux-firmware, but I have to ask internally. Regards, Arend
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature