ср, 3 січ. 2024 р. о 20:20 Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> пише: > > On January 3, 2024 6:28:33 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 3 січня 2024 р. 11:22:42 GMT+02:00, Arend Van Spriel > > <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> написав(-ла): > >> On January 3, 2024 10:14:42 AM Arend Van Spriel > >> <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> + linux-wireless > >>> + Hans de Goede > >>> > >>> > >>> On December 16, 2023 9:14:48 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> сб, 16 груд. 2023 р. о 21:57 Arend van Spriel > >>>> <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> пише: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 12/16/2023 6:45 PM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > >>>>>> Greetings! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am trying to submit bluetooth firmwares (BCM4329B1.*,*.hcd and > >>>>>> BCM4330B1.*,*.hcd) and wifi calibration files > >>>>>> (brcmfmac4329-sdio.*,*.txt and brcmfmac4329-sdio.*,*.txt) from a few > >>>>>> Tegra 2 and Tegra 3 based devices into linux-fimware. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have faced ambiguous license issue since those files were part of > >>>>>> Android Images of different vendors. Those vendors did not provide a > >>>>>> license nor for android images, not for these files. > >> > >> Does this mean you extracted them from the android image? That probably > >> never get accepted without any license information. > > > > Can Broadcom re-grant license to these files? > > > > This license is for bcm4329 in crespo > > <https://android.googlesource.com/device/samsung/crespo/+/refs/heads/main/self-extractors/broadcom/LICENSE> > > Actually checked this link: > > https://android.googlesource.com/device/samsung/crespo/+/refs/heads/main/proprietary-blobs.txt > > It lists the bcm4329.hcd file as falling under Apache-2.0 license. Same for > asus/grouper. > > Regards, > Arend So this actually resolves ambiguity. Thanks Best regards, Svyatoslav R.
