On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 06:44 +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote: > Hi. > > Richard Farina wrote: > > I recently saw this additional comment added to wireless-testing.git and > > it has me a bit concerned. I use this feature for a specific patch set > > that I maintain and it would break it pretty bad to remove this. > > Just an idea: what prevents you to add a patch to that patchset that > reenables the amount of code you require from the CHAN_DEBUG stuff should > it be removed upstream? Seconded, upstream should remove all the junk that it doesn't directly need. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
