> > > > +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev)
> {
> > > > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr;
> > > > + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are
> > > supported */
> > > > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION &&
> > > > + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy,
> >
> > We do need wdev here,
> >
>
> Oh right, I missed that, sorry.
>
> > I will change it to be wireless device instead
> >
>
> No need I guess, if we're only going to check for it being a station?
> Would we ever have a reason to call this for a p2p/nan device? I guess
> not, since that doesn't affect regulatory in the same way?
No, I don't think P2P/NAN devices can anyhow affect regulatory, for sure not for concurrent DFS case.
>
> johannes
