> cfg80211_valid_disable_subchannel_bitmap(u16 *bitmap,
> > * case disconnect instead.
> > * Also note that the wdev mutex must be held.
> > */
> > +
> > void cfg80211_links_removed(struct net_device *dev, u16 link_mask);
>
> What happened there?
No idea, it wasn't in the original patch.. Will recheck with Gregory and fix it.
>
> > +void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check(struct net_device *netdev) {
> > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = netdev->ieee80211_ptr;
> > + struct wiphy *wiphy = wdev->wiphy;
> > +
> > + /* Schedule channels check if NO_IR or DFS relaxations are
> supported */
> > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION &&
> > + (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(wiphy,
> > +
> NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_DFS_CONCURRENT) ||
> > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_RELAX_NO_IR) &&
> > + wiphy->regulatory_flags &
> REGULATORY_ENABLE_RELAX_NO_IR)))
> > + reg_check_channels();
> > +}
>
> That ... doesn't even use the netdev pointer, apart from going to the wiphy?
> Why not have a wiphy argument instead?
We do need wdev here, I will change it to be wireless device instead
>
> johannes
